if anything doesn‘t have any purpose, it’s probably art.
is this a valid definition of art? does this imply that anything with a purpose is probably no art at all? what is purpose in the context of art – pour (une) pose…?
.well, the first purpose is for the artist to get laid.
.the best reason to paint is that there is no reason to paint… keith haring
.art on purpose
.charles krafft
0 Antworten auf “art and logic”